Sandy Kosasi


Abstracts: The fact that occurs in the application of EA is apparently not as easy or smooth as expected or under exposure of the concepts EA theory itself. Information technology decisions that are not built from a series of precise analysis, fundamental, and in accordance with the specification requirements will guide the organization to the conditions paradox of information technology. Planning still partial in which only focused on specific business processes, lack of flexibility, appropriate planning, portfolio management, work measurement, and processes needed to manage information technology expenditure. Many organizations simply look at EA as a collection of a number of business applications and software are needed at this time and not as an essential framework to support business strategy. The failure of the application of EA is also not uncommon to be caused by problems in non-technical areas such as leadership, communication and change management skills. The focus of the EA should be able to provide value to organizational growth, change organizational culture, performance and productivity of every business process, and can execute a broader organizational strategy according to the model of the application of EA in the organization.

Keywords : Enterprise Architecture (EA), Business-IT Alignment framework, Paradox of Information Technology, and non-technical areas.


Enterprise Architecture (EA); Business-IT Alignment framework; Paradox of Information Technology; and non-technical areas;

Full Text:



CIO Council, 2001, A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture.

Gartner, 2006, Incorporating Security Into the Enterprise Architecture Process, Gartner


Gronlund A., 2009, - Why the Swedish E-Government Action

Plan Will Not Deliver Better Government, and How It Could. International

Journal of Public Information Systems. 2009; 5(2): 61-75.

Krisnanda, Made., 2007, Masalah-Masalah yang Terdapat dalam Pengembangan

Enterprise Architecture, Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Vol.2 No.2 September 2007,

(Hal 81-93).

Lagerstrom, Robert, 2011, Enterorise Architecture Management's Impact On Information Technology Success, Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International

Conference on System ScMinoli, Daniel., 2008, Enterprise Architecture A to Z: Frameworks, Business Process

Modeling, SOA, and Infrastructure Technology, CRC Press.

Osvalds, G., 2001, Definition on Enterprise Architecture Centric Models for The

Systems Engineers, TASC Inc.

Russel, Jesse., and Cohn, Ronald., 2009, Zachman Framework, Bookvika Publishing.

Strassmann, P., 1997, The Squandered Computer, Information Economics Press, New


Surendro, Kridanto., 2009, Pengembangan Rencana Induk Sistem Informasi, Penerbit

Informatika, Bandung.

Salma, Linda., dan Vijaya, Annas., 2007, Enterprise Architecture: Antara Teori dan

Praktek, Prosiding KNSI 2007, (Hal 43-46), Informatika Bandung.

Wijaya, Dedy Rahman., 2009, Manajemen Resiko Aspek Perubahan (Change) dan

Keselarasan (Alignment), Pada Arsitektur Enterprise, Prosiding KNS&I09-005,

Bali 14 Nopember 2009, (Hal 25-30).

Zarvic, N., Wieringa, N., 2006, An Integrated Enterprise Architecture Framework for

Business-IT Alignment, University of Twente, Information System Groups,

Netherlands.iences, 1530-1605/11, IEEE.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1368 times
PDF - 4129 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 SISFOTENIKA

Badan Pengelola Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika (SISFOTENIKA) STMIK Pontianak.


Jurnal Ilmiah SISFOTENIKA terindex di :











ISSN Printed : 2087-7897

ISSN Online : 2460-5344


Jurnal Ilmiah SISFOTENIKA Terakreditasi Peringkat Empat


Partners & Co-Organizers:

Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal Ilmiah SISFOTENIKA: STMIK Pontianak Online Journal ISSN Printed (2087-7897) - ISSN Online (2460-5344) licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional. Flag Counter

View My Stats>