Application Of Confederation Methods, Route reflector And Next hop self On BGP Routing

Gilfan Niando, Iwan Wahyuddin, Andrianingsih Andrianingsih

Abstract


Advances in communication technology affect the need for larger networks. The bigger the network, the more routes there are. In BGP, the larger the session formed on the AS, the slower the network communication. Some ways to reduce the amount of information in the routing table are to use the confederation method, route reflector and route next hop self. In this study, we will discuss the simulation of the application of the confederation method, route reflector and route next hop self in BGP routing on different AS relationships to reduce the amount of information in the routing table. This study was made to provide a solution for full-mesh conditions in BGP. The application uses GNS3 software to create prototypes and network simulations. So that it can be applied to real networks later. The test is to calculate the forwarding delay, delay and throughput. Based on the experiments conducted, the three methods resulted in 7% lower forwarding delay, 29% lower end-to-end delay, and 26% higher throughput than full-mesh BGP. This proves that these three methods can reduce the routing table and make packet data delivery faster. For further research, it is hoped that it can be applied to real case studies so that effectiveness and efficiency can be assessed as well as the impact of the configuration used in real.

Keywords


BGP; Confederation; Next Hop; Reflector

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


S. Amuda, M. F. Mulya, and F. I. Kurniadi, “Analisis dan Perancangan Simulasi Perbandingan Kinerja Jaringan Komputer Menggunakan Metode Protokol Routing Statis, Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) dan Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) (Studi Kasus Tanri Abeng University),” J. SISKOM-KB (Sistem Komput. dan Kecerdasan Buatan), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–63, 2021, doi: 10.47970/siskom-kb.v4i2.189.

K. M. Yulianta, “PERANCANGAN DAN ANALISA IPV6 DAN IPV4 DALAM ROUTING BGP ( BORDER GATEWAY PROTOCOL ) UNTUK PENINGKATAN LAYANAN JARINGAN Pendahuluan IP version 6 ( IPv6 ) adalah versi protokol Internet yang sekarang dikembangkan untuk menggantikan IP version 4 ( IPv4 ), ve,” pp. 892–898.

A. Z. Al Ghivani, “Studi Perbandingan Routing Protokol BGP Dan EIGRP, Evaluasi Kinerja Performansi Pada Autonomous System Berbeda,” J. Sist., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–105, 2018.

R. D. Marcus and E. Tfuakani, “Perancangan Jaringan Skala Besar dengan Menggunakan Metode Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Berbasis Mikrotik,” Briliant J. Ris. dan Konseptual, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 401, 2019, doi: 10.28926/briliant.v4i3.361.

M. I. Azhari, T. M. Diansyah, and A. Usman, “Perbandingan Routing Protocol Exterior Bgp Versi 4 Dengan Routing Interior Eigrp Pada Algoritma Linkstate Menggunakan Parameter Packet Loss,” J. Teknol. Inf., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 185, 2019, doi: 10.36294/jurti.v3i2.1071.

T. G. Laksana and W. Chandra, “Penerapan Dan Simulasi Protokol Routing Bgp Dan Ospf Menggunakan Metode Redistribute Pada Backbone Pt . Pusri,” pp. 158–167, 2019.

A.- Maulana, “Penerapan Routing EIGRP, RIPv2 Dan OSPF Pada IPv6 Menggunakan Metode Redistribution,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 234–243, 2018, doi: 10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v15i2.14276.

E. R. Saputra, “ANALISIS PERFORMANSI JARINGAN AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM DENGAN METODE CONFEDERATIONS ( RFC 5065 ),” 2011.

W. S. Sihombing, I. Faisal, and ..., “Penerapan Routing Border Gateway Protocol Pada Jaringan Multi Autonomous System,” … Komun. Ke-7, pp. 194–200, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://prosiding.snastikom.com/index.php/SNASTIKOM2020/article/view/59.

T. Ernawati and J. Endrawan, “Peningkatan Kinerja Jaringan Komputer dengan Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) dan Dynamic Routing (Studi Kasus PT Estiko Ramanda),” Khazanah Inform. J. Ilmu Komput. dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 35, 2018, doi: 10.23917/khif.v4i1.5656.

H. A. Musril, “Simulasi Interkoneksi Antara Autonomous System (As) Menggunakan Border Gateway Protocol (Bgp),” InfoTekJar (Jurnal Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jaringan), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.30743/infotekjar.v2i1.151.

Black, U. (2000). IP Routing Protocols RIP, OSPF, BGP, PNNI & CISCO ROUTING PROTOCOL. New Jersey: Practice Hall PTR.

Abdelhalim, A., & others. (2002). IP/MPLSAbdelhalim, A., & others. (2002). IP/MPLSBased VPN Layer-3 vs. Layer-2. Foundry Network.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30700/jst.v12i1.1221

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 58 times
PDF (Indonesian) - 46 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 SISFOTENIKA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Badan Pengelola Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika (SISFOTENIKA) STMIK Pontianak.

 

Jurnal Ilmiah SISFOTENIKA terindex di :


   

   

  

    

    

    

   

 

 

 

ISSN Printed : 2087-7897

ISSN Online : 2460-5344


SERTIFIKAT PENGHARGAAN :

Jurnal Ilmiah SISFOTENIKA Terakreditasi Peringkat Empat

 

Partners & Co-Organizers:




Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal Ilmiah SISFOTENIKA: STMIK Pontianak Online Journal ISSN Printed (2087-7897) - ISSN Online (2460-5344) licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional. Flag Counter

View My Stats>